« Here’s To A Bigger Majority In 2006 | Home | ExploitTerriPAC »
Rachel Corrie Set Up To Die For Propaganda
By Matt Margolis | January 3, 2006
Interesting stuff from IsraPundit…
Omdurman.org has already compiled several pieces of evidence to suggest that the International Solidarity Movement and/or its Palestinian handlers knowingly and willfully set up peace activist Rachel Corrie to be killed so they could make propaganda. Further information has come to light that reinforces this belief.
In my experience protesting the Pro-Palestine nutcases, they brough up Rachel Corrie many times… It’s all starting to makes sense now isn’t it?
Topics: General |
Related Posts:
January 4th, 2006 at 12:33 pm
I followed the links you posted as so-called ‘evidence’ to support your outrageous headline. All I found was slander and misinformation. I’m glad to see that right wingers are still capable of bullying dead girls.
http://www.rachelcorrie.org/
January 4th, 2006 at 12:39 pm
Cry me a river Winston. Linking to a Rachel Corrie site isn’t going to make your claims any stronger.
January 4th, 2006 at 8:08 pm
Matt,
Nice link.
Just make up shit if you have to.
It works at the VP level.
January 4th, 2006 at 11:26 pm
Robert,
Interesting. Please enumerate some of the lies that the VP has told. But first, look up lie in the dictionary and see if your examples fit the description. That guy walked away from a billion dollars in options to become VP. Something the Kerry’s or Kennedy’s would NEVER do.
Winston,
I kind of agree with you on that link. Of course, the quotes about people watching the tragedy are pretty much how I remember them. Her case, when it happened, reminded me of the anti-war protester (or was it anti-nuke)who sat in front of a train - and lost his legs.
If she beleived in her cause, then she chose to make that sacrafice. I’m sure the next bus of children killed by a “Palestinian” understood and agreed with her moral choice - as they thought of their mommies.
January 4th, 2006 at 11:28 pm
Great quote from Rush:
“The media lied, the coal miners died”
January 5th, 2006 at 12:49 pm
Here you go Khan,
“Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction”.
Dick Cheney
Speech to VFW National Convention
August 26, 2002
Simply stated, that’s bullshit. Does he get extra credit for lying to war veterans?
January 5th, 2006 at 8:57 pm
Ahhhhh. But to lie requires knowledge that you are wrong. You didn’t look it up. Idiot.
EVERYONE thought he did. You know that. Don’t you? He honestly stated something which later turned out to be wrong. So did Kerry, so did everone.
So - YOU lied. You know he didn’t. But you said he did. That is a lie.
January 5th, 2006 at 9:22 pm
Time for a rant.
1. No matter how many time leftys try to redefine the words – The administration did not lie. They were the victims of bad intelligence that spanned the intelligence apparatus of all the major western powers, Russia, Jordan, Israel, and Egypt. Did the Democrat congressmen and Senators also lie? Did the New York Times?
2. You cried Haliburton over and over and over. But, you never actually suggested that any other organization or corporation could have done what they did. It really spoke of massive ignorance on your side – ignorance or cynical dishonesty.
3. The President has enormous power during wartime. The best example is Abraham Lincoln during the civil war. Then, enemy saboteurs and spies were summarily killed by field officers. The Army killed thousands of American citizens (who were wearing grey uniforms) at multiple battles, and the Secret Service was created as an internal intelligence agency. The al-queada people working in this country (citizens or not) are enemy soldiers out-of-uniform with plans to kill YOU. They hate YOU. They kill kids, old people, anyone. It is entirely proper that the NSA be used as a military instrument to protect us. Dead people have no rights.
4. When Bush took over from Clinton the economy was already in a slight recession. The 9/11 attacks made it worse. You ridiculed his economic plans and you used to call it the “Bush Economy”. Of course, you’ve stopped sayings that haven’t you? Because his plan worked.
5. You made such a big deal out of how stupid Bush is. Funny, you also claim he duped you into war (so you must be REALLY stupid). Then, it turned out he had better grades than Kerry in College. And – eventually earned his money. Instead of marrying someone with it – who had gotten it by marrying someone else.
6. You made sure that Bush’s plan to protect Social Security was killed. Even when he offered to be flexible. Good thing we’re going with the Democrat plan – oh wait. No, there was no plan. It will go broke or require an even bigger bail out when it goes into met down.
7. You rightly criticized FEMA for some shortcomings during Katrina. But dishonestly failed to state the actual defined role of that organization or any of the real failures of the Democratic leaders on the ground in New Orleans and Louisiana in general. You wrongly claimed that it was all because the victims were black 9when it later turned out a higher percentage of whites were killed).
8. You continue to REFUSE to support our military. These men and women are under arms and fighting some real assholes in a real shithole – and you won’t do anything to help them.
9. Let’s hear YOUR plan you lefty anarchist assholes. Lets here YOUR plan to stop terrorists who just bought an unregistered telephone at 7/11 and put $200 of airtime on it. Lets hear how YOU plan to save social security. Lets see you indignation at how rich Democrats like Soros, Kerry, Kennedy, and others move their money into trusts and offshore to avoid taxes. How will YOU defeat terrorism? How will you keep the economy strong (by raising taxes as usual? Good plan). How will you keep the idiots in Louisiana from building UNDER SEA LEVEL and stealing money destined for the dykes – again? How will you do anything? I know – call us names. Make crap up. Spit your vile hatred at us. That should do it – oh yea.
January 5th, 2006 at 11:17 pm
If everyone had bad intelligence then how come so few were with us?
30,000 Iraqis kahn. 30,000.
January 6th, 2006 at 12:45 am
Because they were selling weapons to the Sadaam (Russia, France). They’re leaders were paid off (France, Germany, UN)in the Oil for food scandal. And Not EVERYONE was against us.
The 30,000 number is a nice touch to your post. But, has nothing really to do with the question does it? The vast majority of Iraqi deaths have been Iragi and terrorist killing Iraqi’s. If we had pulled out right after winning, or indeed if we pulled out now the Shiites and the Kurds would kill every single Sunni in the triangle.
We knew Sadaam was bad. He was flagrantly violating the terms of the Cease-fire agreement from Gulf Wat One, and dammit - we thouight he had nuclear weapons. With that belief - we cold not not go.
3500 Dead in NYC, Virginia, and Pennsylvania John. 3500.
But what is YOUR plan dipweed? What would John have done differently? What would he do now?
January 6th, 2006 at 12:54 am
Ohhhh,
And I forgot to bitch about the ACLU attack on the Boy Scouts of America. Their law suit has made the Army pull Fort A.P. Hill out as the national Jamboree site. They say its because of religion - but notice this argument started AFTER they lost on the gay issue. So - LIBERALS - why do you want homosexual men to take our 10 and 11 year old boys camping in the woods? And, if we don’t like it - you’re willing to kill the Boy Scouts? You must be so damn proud.
And, What part of “The right to bear arms shall not be abridged” leads you to believe the right should be abridged or ended? That issu alone cost Gore and Kerry no less than five states. This issue is NOT about hunting. But you hate that too.
And, Why do liberals NOT think our borders should be secure?
And, why is it you are all so ignorant? You never have any actual facts. At least no relavent ones. As soon as we peg you on something - you jump tracks and begin a new hate filled chant.
January 6th, 2006 at 8:26 am
Have you checked your own reference ? When you follow through, all you find is an unsubstantiated and unverifiable claim in a form letter the anti-palestinian (sp?) web site has put up to encourage people to send.
There is zero substance to that claim. Someone ought to do his homework.
Oh, and while we are at it, I have a hefty dislike for that lkind of “the devil made me do it” excuses. The guy in the Israeli army bulldozer knew quite well what he did when he moved his vessel to crunch Rachel Corrie to death, and no amount of “uh… they set me up” whining will change that.
He. Killed. Her.
January 6th, 2006 at 10:31 am
Chris,
Hey thanks for YOUR references.