« We Aren’t At the Cannes Festival Anymore, Toto. | Home | Meeting RNC Chairman Ed Gillespie »
F-ck you, Hillary
By Matt Margolis | May 25, 2004
Sometimes the lousy bitch just can’t keep herself from making an ass of herself:
Re-electing President Bush will mean a loss of freedoms and “create an America we won’t recognize,” Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton is telling potential Democratic donors.
In an e-mail appeal distributed by the Democratic National Committee to help Sen. John Kerry’s presidential campaign, the former first lady said “the stakes in this election are incredibly high.”
“If they get their way, you and I will be living in an America governed not by our hopes, but by our fears,” Clinton wrote. “We’ll be living in an America where we see our freedoms diminished when they ought to be embraced, our rights restricted when they ought to be strengthened.”
Democrats were spewing the same crap 4 years ago… Clearly, Hillary has gained no sense of political decency, but then again, this is Hillary we’re talking about. It sounds like she’s trying to make some sort of parallel to the PATRIOT Act… If that is the case, then I find it hard for that bitch to critcize since she voted for it.
But hey, if dead people can vote for Hillary, I guess she can vote for the PATRIOT Act and then disavow that vote.
The fat trap opened some more:
“The Bush-Cheney campaign has blown $70 million on negative ads, but it is still tied in the polls with John Kerry,” Clinton added.
Unfortunate for her, she’s wrong… the ads had a real impact, and the recent analysis of the latest polling from Matthew Dowd, chief strategist for the Bush campaign, shows that Kerry really isn’t doing as well as Democrats would like to believe.
The Bush campaign has yet to comment on Hillary’s stupidity.
But I have a comment for Hillary: F-ck you!
NOTE: Yes, her comments really pissed me off because of her blatent disregard for reality. I’d offer more calm and collected arguments in this if I wasn’t so fumed…
Topics: General |
Related Posts:
May 25th, 2004 at 2:10 pm
Matt, you are most probably pissed off because truth hurts. I never believed anything Hilary said. But you got so rude and profane that I have to wonder why and start reading her statements - maybe there is something truthful in them.
I am sure that chief strategist for the Bush campaign will find that he is doing a good job, even if he has to fidget with the data. I don’t see how is you reality more real than Hilary’s.
May 25th, 2004 at 2:19 pm
… and Matt, we see that you want to ‘F-ck’ Hillary, but I doubt she would give it to you. I am really sorry that a sex life of a college boy such as yourself is so bad that you have to fantasize about middle-aged congress women. Please take my advice: do not EVER mention Madeleine Albright in your posts - who knows what people will think of you.
May 25th, 2004 at 2:26 pm
i find her comments dispicable and blatently false.
and since when does saying “fuck you” to a person imply desire towards that person? please.. i wouldn’t touch her with a 10 foot pole
May 25th, 2004 at 2:45 pm
Right, Matt, right. You obsession with Hillary is patently obvious. She is not your senator and she obviously doesn’t represent your viewpoint, yet you can’t get enough of her. It’s really creepy… but I guess you can dare to dream.
May 25th, 2004 at 3:46 pm
And she wouldn’t be your senator either Cole if it wasn’t for the pardoning of those puerto rican terrorists that her husband let out of prison.
May 25th, 2004 at 8:05 pm
Stupid rightwingers; stupid leftwingers
Kellen reads a Jeff Jacoby column calling Ted Kennedy anti-American and says call me anti-American too. … just this morning i was venting my frustration…
May 25th, 2004 at 8:13 pm
Hillary Clinton, leftwing idiot
Matt expresses doubts he will be having tea with Hillary Clinton any time soon, because of comments she made about an alleged climate of fear…
May 26th, 2004 at 9:34 am
Democrats were spewing the same crap 4 years ago…
And now they have four years of solid evidence to back them up.
May 26th, 2004 at 10:20 am
riiiiight
May 26th, 2004 at 11:01 pm
you and I will be living in an America governed not by our hopes, but by our fears,” Clinton wrote. “We’ll be living in an America where we see our freedoms diminished when they ought to be embraced, our rights restricted when they ought to be strengthened
Hmm, I find this statement incredibly interesting especially since it’s coming from one of the most socialistic liberals in office today, and who is that fat cow to talk about anyone spending money on negative ads when that is all that came from the Democratic party all throughout the primary season (and not to mention from MoveOn.org).
I still don’t get how all these liberals can come out and cry fowl over the PATRIOT act and then turn around only to be the first to criticise the President should anything bad happen (i.e., the witchhunt known as the 9/11 commission).
Keep fighting the good fight and we’ll keep reading!
May 27th, 2004 at 8:12 am
Hey Matt…that’s OK…I wouldn’t even touch her with YOUR ten foot pole!
May 27th, 2004 at 3:14 pm
gee. while you guys yell and whine how she’s full of shit your government passed yet another bill which encroaches on your liberties. Oh and the newest fake terror warning makes her case when she says your nation is being motivated by fear.
May 27th, 2004 at 7:07 pm
You mean a loss of freedoms like these, quoting: “During the Clinton years, journalists who probed too deeply into Clinton scandals ran terrible risks. Journalists were beaten, wiretapped, framed on criminal charges, fired and blacklisted. They experienced burglaries, IRS audits, smear campaigns and White-House-orchestrated lawsuits.” or these “In February 1998, Hillary announced that the Internet needed an “editing or gatekeeping function.” By the time she spoke those words, Hillary was already hard at work putting her gatekeeping machinery into place.
Her most damaging attacks against the Internet came disguised as private lawsuits, brought by third parties. For instance, Hillary operative Sid Blumenthal sued Matt Drudge for $30 million in 1997, charging defamation. The lawsuit was clearly orchestrated by the White House. David Horowitz came to Drudge’s rescue, providing him with free legal representation, and got slapped with an IRS audit for his troubles. The case dragged on for years, but, soon after the Clintons left office, Blumenthal dropped his suit.” Wrong administration for those tactics.
May 27th, 2004 at 7:12 pm
Arrggh, I need to change my name.. why must I be forced to share my name with a liberal like this?!
What civil liberties does this bill encroach?? Gee, I’m still able to do everything I’ve always done, so, too bad your point is moot. If anything, they are making out police and law enforcement stronger so they can, you know, actually have the tools necessary to defeat crime!
I hate when I have to spell things out for liberals.
I find it ironic that on a day when the DHS comes out and issues a terror warning the liberals are all out of their mind saying President Bush is trying to instill fear in the American public; Yet, they ALSO continue to bombard the President with criticism that he didn’t do ENOUGH before 9/11.. ahh, gotta love the hipocrites on the left.
July 14th, 2004 at 6:10 pm
Matty, Matty, Matty….
As if you inane BS weren’t enough, your blind support for the Bushzealots is absolutley nauseating. Without question, you support the Bushies because they are Republican, and because the mouth what you want to hear. Last night I heard Bush repeat “AMURkans are safer” (thats Bush speak for American) 12 f-ing times. Despite offering no proof (and yes, the facts are anti-Bush: TERRORISM DOUBLED IN 2003) he repeated it over and over again. Then, zealots like you say, “well, the president says were safer, so we must be safer!” That is called repetitive propaganda. They repeat the lie until it becomes true to half-wits like you. You won’t post this because you are scared of the truth. The truth hurts sucka!