« Unplanned Parenthood … Unplanned Death | Home | Howard Dean Against America »
War On Terror (R-USA)
By Matt Margolis | September 24, 2003
When the Democrats criticize Bush, the only thing they are concerned with is furthering their own agenda and their party’s agenda. The Democrat’s agenda today is to impede the war on terror.
You heard me.
To the Democrats, criticizing George W. Bush is more natural than breathing.
They seek to undermine the progress made by Bush and his administration by questioning a cause they supported months and/or years ago.
Ted Kennedy, Senator-at-Large from Massachusetts, recently said about Iraq, “There was no imminent threat. This was made up in Texas, announced in January to the Republican leadership that war was going to take place and was going to be good politically. This whole thing was a fraud.”
Oh really Teddy? Isn’t it funny, last September you said “I not only concede, but I am convinced that President Bush believes genuinely in the course [invading Iraq] he urges upon us.”
Made up in Texas, huh? What’s with the flip-flop Teddy? Is an election coming up Teddy?
Wait, what else did you say?
There is no doubt that Saddam Hussein’s regime is a serious danger, that he is a tyrant, and that his pursuit of lethal weapons of mass destruction cannot be tolerated. He must be disarmed.
Funny, George W. Bush said the same thing.
There is clearly a threat from Iraq, and there is clearly a danger, but the Administration has not made a convincing case that we face such an imminent threat to our national security that a unilateral, pre-emptive American strike and an immediate war are necessary.
This is the difference between Democrats and Republicans. Democrats are more than willing to sit around and wait to be attacked again. Republicans actually want to prevent terrorism.
Teddy’s remarks from a year ago show you what the real motivation behind his words is. It’s political hate speech. He’s taking the war on terror and painting it as George W. Bush’s political weapon.
The result? America looks weak. The war on terror looks like a farce. The resolve we once showed appears to have waned. The terrorists then think they can hit us again.
The Democrats are hurting the war on terror. By questioning the battles we fight, they pave the way for other nations to question our efforts, which can break down our coalition. Teddy’s flip-flops are only a small portion of the radical changes Democrats have made on their positions on the war on terror to suit their political motives.
Come on Teddy, even you conceded George W. Bush genuinely believed in the cause he pursued.
Even you admitted that Saddam was an evil tyrant pursing weapons of mass of destruction.
Even you admitted that Iraq posed a threat.
The difference between Teddy and George W. Bush is that Bush wants to prevent terrorism - Teddy wants to react to terrorism.
Who has really politicized the war? Any thinking person would be able to see that George W. Bush has actually kept his word to fight terrorism.
The Democrats… they’ve been feeding their constituency with anti-Bush rhetoric and criticizing the war on terror. Which is actually going to help defeat terrorism? Which is actually going to save American lives?
It is ever so clear, that the war on terror is the Republicans’ war, not the Democrats’. They can sit around and wait for the terrorists to hit us if they want to, but I’m going to stand with the Republicans, and support the war on terror, support the President, and support the troops.
You, my readers can do the same donating to Bush’s campaign and/or volunteer your time. The best way to support the war on terror is keep George W. Bush in office.
Topics: Bush 2004 |
Related Posts:
September 24th, 2003 at 12:37 pm
Right on, Matt!
September 24th, 2003 at 2:18 pm
Swimmer has been hitting the bottle a bit too much again recently (or so it seems)
September 25th, 2003 at 11:16 pm
I thnk that Swimmer needs to put up or shut up
Same goes for all the people writing into the Globe cheering Swimmer on
September 26th, 2003 at 12:49 pm
It’s almost as if the Democrats are being directly influenced from the remnants of Saddam Hussein’s regime.
September 26th, 2003 at 4:03 pm
Yes Matt thats exactly what it is. While Shrub is the avatar for the spirits of for Mussolini,Franco and Hitler
September 26th, 2003 at 4:27 pm
This coming from someone who supports infanticide…
September 26th, 2003 at 5:49 pm
You support Bush and you are a member of the known hate group Free Republic. Like I care if you say I kill babies.
September 26th, 2003 at 5:52 pm
Did you see Best Of the Web (at Opinion Journal today)? It talks about Dems using Patriotism as a campaign issue.
September 26th, 2003 at 6:15 pm
Um Yeah, you are a hate group.
September 26th, 2003 at 10:03 pm
Great post Matt you totally nailed them on their lack of credibility
Back to blogging, Paul
September 26th, 2003 at 10:29 pm
Did you make that comment using nothing but brain stem Matt?
September 26th, 2003 at 11:59 pm
Um Yeah is such a anti-American which isn’t his/her fault it just happens to be the party platform for Liberals
September 27th, 2003 at 10:22 am
I’m trying to picture what a slug like Dumb Yeah looks like. I picture a less masculine version of Rachel Corrie.
September 27th, 2003 at 11:10 am
Thanks RR thats pretty damn Masculine. Oh and I bet I love my country more than any of you starve the government freaks.
September 28th, 2003 at 7:48 pm
OT,
Thanks RR for the hilarious UY & Barney e-mail.
Heard it on the radio too a while back.
September 28th, 2003 at 7:51 pm
“Starve the government freaks’?
Please! Feel free to tell the government to keep your tax refund next year! (or pay more in, if you so desire-)
September 29th, 2003 at 1:42 pm
UY loves his country? Ha!
October 21st, 2003 at 6:17 pm
you sick people always think the country and the administration are the same and that it wrong to have dissenting oppinions. that is exactly what happened in nazi germany. Ein Volk, Ein Reich, Ein Fuehrer. only now it is: one war, one president.
October 21st, 2003 at 6:23 pm
patriotism and critism do not exclude eachother. patriotism does not mean that you think that everything that is done in name of your country is right. patriotism is that you make sure that youre country does the right thing by critisising what is wrong.
October 30th, 2003 at 11:06 am
Oh, poor Bush. His political opponents are always disagreeing with him! And the voicing that disagreement by saying he’s wrong! Deary me, it’s like politics has become often mean-spirited and oppositional!
Oh, wait. That’s exactly how every single president ever has been treated, my bad.
Seriously, you can support Bush all you like (and I see what you like about him, I just disagree on some of the issues), but say that the Democrats shouldn’t critisize the actions of their political opponents is like saying water should run up hill.
October 31st, 2003 at 1:43 pm
commentSeriously, you can support Bush all you like (and I see what you like about him, I just disagree on some of the issues), but say that the Democrats shouldn’t critisize the actions of their political opponents is like saying water should run up hill.
By all means, keep criticizing him without offering any solutions of your own! (other than tax raises and appeasement of our enemies) See how far it’ll get you in the polls! (and Nov,2004)
October 31st, 2003 at 2:36 pm
most of the things they say are pure pig shit. And not only that, they are extremely bad for the morale of our troops. Questioning the president in the manner they are doing everyday is not the way to do it.. There are better ways to question the policies.
October 31st, 2003 at 8:31 pm
Java,
I’m convinced beyond a shadow of a doubt that most of the left wing media (AHEM-Dan Blather) want to relive the 1960s, their glory days.
To the Left Wing of the Democratic Party:RETURN TO POWER/POLITICS>SECURITY OF THIS COUNTRY.
November 4th, 2003 at 4:02 pm
So what do you allow as things acceptable for the Democrats to debate?
ie. “They can talk all the want about how to run the occupation, but not whether we should”, or “They can talk about how much money we should give, but not whether we should”
March 12th, 2004 at 2:47 pm
Al-Quieda’s new slogan should be “planes, trains & automobiles!”
March 22nd, 2004 at 2:54 pm
I think that the war is one of the best things for this country. If it was not for the war we would not be united as a country as much as we are today. Besides these other country’s had it comeing anyways. People don’t understand the goog that Bush is doing for this country. We are haveing people die over there, but in the long run it is worth it. The only way to get rid of a virus is to kill it and that is exactly what we are doing!
May 8th, 2004 at 8:56 pm
Remember that without criticism or scrutiny a nation cannot come close to be called a democracy.
“Without conforming, being uniform, following orders, and blindly following our leaders. We shall never be free.” - A quote from a 1970’s sitcom
June 9th, 2004 at 11:44 pm
If people were to delve into terrorist doctrine and see the true nature of the threat we face, not only would they support Iraq…but they’d be ready to go into some other countries as well.
October 28th, 2004 at 1:06 am
The Bush admenestration are failures. If you read the 9-11 Commision Report, you will know that Bush got a warning that the U.S. would be attacked by aircraft. Bush did nonthing to try to prevent it. 15 out of the 19 highjackers were from Saudia Arabia. The others were from Afganistan. There was no evidence Iraq helped them. Bush chose to go after Iraq instead of Arabia. He only did it for the oil. He didn’t care about setting them free. Damn President Bush! He can go to hell!