The World Tribune reported today that the United States suspects that Saddam Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction are in Lebanon.

Those of us who have always known Saddam had weapons of mass destruction are not surprised. However, should this information result in an extraordinary discovery in the near future, it won’t be good enough for the liberal anti-Bush ideologues who wouldn’t believe Bush if he said the Earth was round.

U.S. intelligence suspects Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction have finally been located.

Unfortunately, getting to them will be nearly impossible for the United States and its allies, because the containers with the strategic materials are not in Iraq.

This is good news, however, this business about not being able to get them is not acceptable. We have to get to them and show to the skeptics liberals that they were wrong beyond a shadow of a doubt.

Instead they are located in Lebanon’s heavily-fortified Bekaa Valley, swarming with Iranian and Syrian forces, and Hizbullah and ex-Iraqi agents, Geostrategy-Direct.com will report in Wednesday’s new weekly edition.

I find it hard to believe that the United States will accept this and not attempt to retrieve the WMD.

U.S. intelligence first identified a stream of tractor-trailer trucks moving from Iraq to Syria to Lebanon in January 2003. The significance of this sighting did not register on the CIA at the time.

U.S. intelligence sources believe the area contains extended-range Scud-based missiles and parts for chemical and biological warheads.

So let’s get them! What are we waiting for?

The CIA now believes a multi-million dollar deal between Iraq and Syria provided for the hiding and safekeeping of Saddam’s strategic weapons.

This is new? Let’s think about this here, Saddam Hussein had plenty of warning that we were going to attack his ass. He knew that George W. Bush was serious, and wasn’t going to let down. So obviously, Saddam went to extraordinary efforts to hide the weapons in the event that he’d survive a U.S. invasion and obtain power again.

So, as far as this news is concerned, we’ll see how things develop. Now, to address the liberals…

Liberals will make any excuse to explain why this information, or the potential seizure of Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction is a farce. Why? Because they’re hatred of President Bush is more important to them than the truth. It is more important than the facts. It is more important than what is right. It is more important than our lives.

Hypothetically speaking, let’s say we can’t prove the WMD are there. Now, while the information may have been reliable, to liberals, the inability to prove it is equivalent to it being a falsehood.

Only liberals are afforded the “luxury” of the benefit of the doubt. When Bill Clinton warned the United States about Iraq’s weapons programs in the 90’s liberals gave him the benefit of the doubt – if they even doubted him at all. George W. Bush on the hand, obviously must have had an ulterior motive, and is immediately called a liar by the left.

So what does this say about liberals today, beside their obvious hypocrisy?

The ultimate truth is they’re willing to give evil terrorists and dictators the benefit of the doubt. They don’t want a commander-in-chief who’s willing to take a chance on reliable intelligence to protect our country.

A Commander-In-Chief who is willing to risk the lives of Americans rather than act on potential threats against them is no Commander-In-Chief I want.

There has been plenty of intelligence supporting Bush’s assertion that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. If more and more intelligence surfaces supporting this, wouldn’t you rather have a President who is willing to take the chance and do something about it, rather than a President who will just sit at his desk with his fly unzipped and let us be attacked?

Any reasonable person who cares about his or her family, friends, relatives, and fellow citizens, would prefer a President who acts on questionable intelligence, rather than waits until it is too late do anything about it.

So, are you a reasonable person?