Archive for April, 2003
Next Entries »The Day The Regime Fell
Wednesday, April 9th, 2003How sweet are the images…
How awesome are the videos…
Freedom. something Americans take for granted, Iraqis are now able to have a taste of.
They are thanking the United States and President Bush for liberating the country.
Remember the joy and happiness of the Iraqi people today. Remember this is what Bush set out to do. This is was Senator Kerry has basically said should not have happened. Remember this day the next time you see a protester and remind yourself who didn’t want to go into Iraq - and ask why.
Remember this day.
Is There a Flaw in the System?
Tuesday, April 8th, 2003I only recently became aware of the fact that my Statement Regarding The SGA President made extremely significant waves on the University of Hartford campus. So significant in fact that Marcy Gotterbarn, the Editor-In-Chief of the Informer, wrote an article in response to the statement that I posted on my website. I was shocked, amazed, and very pleased that something on my website, by means of word-of-mouth only, found it’s way into the “public eye” of University of Hartford. According to Marcy, no report of the incident exists, and if there was, Hersh would not have been able to run for SGA to begin with.
This now brings up a serious issue because I have recently been confirmed through a third party that a report of the incident does in fact exist. With this in mind, I have only one question: If the report does in fact exist, is this an indication that potential candidates for Student Government are not properly screened as University policy says they should be? If this is so, than I fear the University is bound to experience even more embarressments in the future, like it experienced with T.J. Legg.
I am further investigating this matter and will hopefully have an update in the near future.
Kerry Ought to Watch His Words
Thursday, April 3rd, 2003Kerry wants to be President of the United States really bad. He’ll stop at nothing, even bashing President Bush in the most disgustingly inappropriate and unclassy way. According to an article in today’s Boston Globe, Kerry made some remarks yesterday Peterborough Town Library which were completely ridiculous and unbecoming of a Senator and a Presidential hopeful. Kerry claimed that Bush committed a “breach of trust” in the eyes of many United Nations members by going to war with Iraq. Apparently, Kerry thinks that a coalition of 45 countries is a reflection of a breach of trust.
To add to Kerry’s stupidity, he said “What we need now is not just a regime change in Saddam Hussein and Iraq, but we need a regime change in the United States.”
This coming from someone who didn’t have the guts to be present during the Senate vote on partial birth abortions so he wouldn’t have to go on record. Bush has the morals and leadership ability to fight for what he believes in, regardless of what other countries think, and Kerry is the kind of “leader” who avoids high profile votes in the Senate because he’s scared of how his party or the public might react to his vote.
Kerry is a gutless puppet of the Democratic Party. How dare he refer to the Bush Administration in the same manner as Saddam Hussein’s regime.
Only Liberals Have the Right to Protest?
Tuesday, April 1st, 2003Al Gore needs to shut up before he makes himself sound even more stupid.
In an article from “Launch” Al Gore is quoted on his opinion on the recent negativity surrounding the Dixie Chicks after Dixie Chick Natalie Maines, while overseas, said that she was ashamed to be from Texas because of President Bush… or something stupid to that affect. Al Gore, as useless as he is, said to a college audience recently “They were made to feel un-American and risked economic retaliation because of what was said. Our democracy has taken a hit,” Gore said. “Our best protection is free and open debate.”
Are liberals the only people who have a right to protest? Why is it when someone says something negative about the President and the country during a time of war or potential conflict, it is considered patriotic, but when people stand up for the President, the country, and the troops it is considered bullying the opposers, and infringing their right to speak freely, and protest.
If Al Gore thinks Dixie Chick Natalie Maines is some champion of Democracy for her remarks against the President, then those who in turn protested her for what many considered objectionable and inappropriate remarks (by deciding to boycott their music) are even more patriotic.
Apparently, to Al Gore, patriotism is only patriotism if the cause is against America. This is all part of the liberal frame of mind that being anti-establishment is some symbol of free-thinking.
Next Entries »