<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lieberman for Secretary of Homeland Security?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mattmargolis.com/archives/2004/11/21/lieberman-hs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mattmargolis.com/archives/2004/11/21/lieberman-hs/</link>
	<description>Blogger. Author. Reader.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 00:42:32 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: equifax com</title>
		<link>http://www.mattmargolis.com/archives/2004/11/21/lieberman-hs/comment-page-1/#comment-122076</link>
		<dc:creator>equifax com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 01:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=609#comment-122076</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;equifax com&lt;/strong&gt;

wager clamor blackmailed pardons texts Bernhard commutes,enrich:credit http://www.available-credit-report.com/ </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>equifax com</strong></p>
<p>wager clamor blackmailed pardons texts Bernhard commutes,enrich:credit <a href="http://www.available-credit-report.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.available-credit-report.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: san antonio hotels</title>
		<link>http://www.mattmargolis.com/archives/2004/11/21/lieberman-hs/comment-page-1/#comment-120942</link>
		<dc:creator>san antonio hotels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 May 2006 22:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=609#comment-120942</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;san antonio hotels&lt;/strong&gt;

drafting byline derailing.Oregonians Ludmilla wakened smut!colonizes orbitz http://www.hotels-staff.com/ </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>san antonio hotels</strong></p>
<p>drafting byline derailing.Oregonians Ludmilla wakened smut!colonizes orbitz <a href="http://www.hotels-staff.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.hotels-staff.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stones Cry Out</title>
		<link>http://www.mattmargolis.com/archives/2004/11/21/lieberman-hs/comment-page-1/#comment-7716</link>
		<dc:creator>Stones Cry Out</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2004 06:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=609#comment-7716</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Nelson and Lieberman Cabinet Members?&lt;/strong&gt;
...rumor that Nebraska Senator Ben Nelson (D) has turned down an offer by Bush to become Agriculture Secretary.....Matt Margolis posts that Lieberman might be on the short list for head of Homeland Security.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Nelson and Lieberman Cabinet Members?</strong><br />
&#8230;rumor that Nebraska Senator Ben Nelson (D) has turned down an offer by Bush to become Agriculture Secretary&#8230;..Matt Margolis posts that Lieberman might be on the short list for head of Homeland Security.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kahn</title>
		<link>http://www.mattmargolis.com/archives/2004/11/21/lieberman-hs/comment-page-1/#comment-7713</link>
		<dc:creator>kahn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2004 05:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=609#comment-7713</guid>
		<description>Lieberman is all right. I think he would give us a run for the White House, except he is way out of line with all the wacko liberal splinter groups within the Democratic party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lieberman is all right. I think he would give us a run for the White House, except he is way out of line with all the wacko liberal splinter groups within the Democratic party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DeWaun</title>
		<link>http://www.mattmargolis.com/archives/2004/11/21/lieberman-hs/comment-page-1/#comment-7709</link>
		<dc:creator>DeWaun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Nov 2004 22:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=609#comment-7709</guid>
		<description>There have been rumors from Danbury, CT before, ya know. Danbury rumors tend to have lasting effects on our national body &lt;i&gt;(e.g.: letter from Thomas Jefferson to the Danbury Baptist Association -- 1 January 1802)&lt;/i&gt;

Due to an early instance of &quot;judicial activism&quot; in the 1960&#039;s, that one letter (based on un-founded rumors and fears) causes us undeniable grief, today.

Here&#039;s that letter, in &lt;a href=&quot;http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/amendI_religions58.html&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;its entirety&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;:
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;b&gt;Thomas Jefferson to Danbury Baptist Association&lt;/b&gt; — 1 January 1802 — &quot;Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between man and his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legislative powers of government reach actions only, and not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should &quot;make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,&quot; thus building a wall of separation between Church and State. Adhering to this expression of the supreme will of the nation in behalf of the rights of conscience, I shall see with sincere satisfaction the progress of those sentiments which tend to restore to man all his natural rights, convinced he has no natural right in opposition to his social duties.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There have been rumors from Danbury, CT before, ya know. Danbury rumors tend to have lasting effects on our national body <i>(e.g.: letter from Thomas Jefferson to the Danbury Baptist Association &#8212; 1 January 1802)</i></p>
<p>Due to an early instance of &#8220;judicial activism&#8221; in the 1960&#8217;s, that one letter (based on un-founded rumors and fears) causes us undeniable grief, today.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s that letter, in <a href="http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/amendI_religions58.html"><b>its entirety</b></a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><b>Thomas Jefferson to Danbury Baptist Association</b> — 1 January 1802 — &#8220;Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between man and his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legislative powers of government reach actions only, and not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should &#8220;make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,&#8221; thus building a wall of separation between Church and State. Adhering to this expression of the supreme will of the nation in behalf of the rights of conscience, I shall see with sincere satisfaction the progress of those sentiments which tend to restore to man all his natural rights, convinced he has no natural right in opposition to his social duties.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
