<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wictory Wednesday</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mattmargolis.com/archives/2003/12/03/wictory-wednesday/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mattmargolis.com/archives/2003/12/03/wictory-wednesday/</link>
	<description>Blogger. Author. Reader.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 00:42:32 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Emmett</title>
		<link>http://www.mattmargolis.com/archives/2003/12/03/wictory-wednesday/comment-page-1/#comment-2483</link>
		<dc:creator>Emmett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2003 00:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=230#comment-2483</guid>
		<description>Clinton so famously said:

&quot;I never had sex with that woman&quot;

Clinton never did. She did...service him a few times, but that&#039;s not sex. At least not if you look it up in a dicitonary. So technicaly speaking it&#039;s not even perjury. Yes, it&#039;s twisting words. But that doesn&#039;t matter - if the prosecutor wants to force the defendant to answer about all sexual acts, then he should ask.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clinton so famously said:</p>
<p>&#8220;I never had sex with that woman&#8221;</p>
<p>Clinton never did. She did&#8230;service him a few times, but that&#8217;s not sex. At least not if you look it up in a dicitonary. So technicaly speaking it&#8217;s not even perjury. Yes, it&#8217;s twisting words. But that doesn&#8217;t matter &#8211; if the prosecutor wants to force the defendant to answer about all sexual acts, then he should ask.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cannon</title>
		<link>http://www.mattmargolis.com/archives/2003/12/03/wictory-wednesday/comment-page-1/#comment-2430</link>
		<dc:creator>cannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2003 01:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=230#comment-2430</guid>
		<description>No Emmett you Impeach for breaking the law. Oh but that&#039;s right perjury is not breaking the law. Silly me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No Emmett you Impeach for breaking the law. Oh but that&#8217;s right perjury is not breaking the law. Silly me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emmett</title>
		<link>http://www.mattmargolis.com/archives/2003/12/03/wictory-wednesday/comment-page-1/#comment-2428</link>
		<dc:creator>Emmett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2003 22:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=230#comment-2428</guid>
		<description>Or maybe he doesn&#039;t have time to read days old blog forum posts. Because unlike us, he has a life.

Seriously people. He says, it&#039;s not contradictory for MoveOn.org to be against impeaching people for lying about sex, but for impeaching people for sexual harassing people. It may be wrong, it may not be, but it&#039;s clearly not contradictory. 

Everything else you&#039;ve been saying is basically &quot;Clinton is a bad man! I don&#039;t like Clinton!&quot;

But you can&#039;t impeach someone for being a bad man/president, you can only impeach people for being criminals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or maybe he doesn&#8217;t have time to read days old blog forum posts. Because unlike us, he has a life.</p>
<p>Seriously people. He says, it&#8217;s not contradictory for MoveOn.org to be against impeaching people for lying about sex, but for impeaching people for sexual harassing people. It may be wrong, it may not be, but it&#8217;s clearly not contradictory. </p>
<p>Everything else you&#8217;ve been saying is basically &#8220;Clinton is a bad man! I don&#8217;t like Clinton!&#8221;</p>
<p>But you can&#8217;t impeach someone for being a bad man/president, you can only impeach people for being criminals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cannon</title>
		<link>http://www.mattmargolis.com/archives/2003/12/03/wictory-wednesday/comment-page-1/#comment-2412</link>
		<dc:creator>cannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2003 15:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=230#comment-2412</guid>
		<description>Well liberals do have a short attention span (after all they can only debate in jingos... &quot;bush lied=people died&quot; and &quot;it was all about the oil&quot;) so maybe his only two brain cells just misfired and he was distracted. Ya never can tell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well liberals do have a short attention span (after all they can only debate in jingos&#8230; &#8220;bush lied=people died&#8221; and &#8220;it was all about the oil&#8221;) so maybe his only two brain cells just misfired and he was distracted. Ya never can tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trollbaiter</title>
		<link>http://www.mattmargolis.com/archives/2003/12/03/wictory-wednesday/comment-page-1/#comment-2411</link>
		<dc:creator>Trollbaiter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2003 14:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=230#comment-2411</guid>
		<description>Hmmmm, no reply from Mr. Whittaker and it&#039;s been days. That speaks volumes in itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmmm, no reply from Mr. Whittaker and it&#8217;s been days. That speaks volumes in itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ms heather</title>
		<link>http://www.mattmargolis.com/archives/2003/12/03/wictory-wednesday/comment-page-1/#comment-2405</link>
		<dc:creator>ms heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2003 04:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=230#comment-2405</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s put it this way, Cole.

Would you trust Klintoon being alone in a room with your daughter/wife/girlfriend?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s put it this way, Cole.</p>
<p>Would you trust Klintoon being alone in a room with your daughter/wife/girlfriend?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: timekeeper</title>
		<link>http://www.mattmargolis.com/archives/2003/12/03/wictory-wednesday/comment-page-1/#comment-2398</link>
		<dc:creator>timekeeper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2003 15:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=230#comment-2398</guid>
		<description>Hmmmm, Paula Jones didn&#039;t ask for Clinton to drop trou in the hotel when he was her boss. That&#039;s sexual harassment, and it&#039;s certainly actionable. After all, that is why Clinton gave a deposition (under oath), the one in which he perjured himself. 

Juanita Broaddrick did not ask to be raped by Clinton. That was totally non-consensual. There&#039;s no way to spin that.

It is true that the Jones trial was dismissed due to lack of evidence, but the same could be said of Reagan&#039;s and G.H.W. Bush&#039;s involvement in Iran/Contra. We&#039;ll drop Paula Jones when the left shuts up regarding presidential malfeasance in that issue. We&#039;ll drop Whitewater when the left stops lying about Bush&#039;s TANG record. We&#039;ll stop questioning the left&#039;s true loyalties on the war when they stop calling any criticism of their position  &quot;McCarthyism&quot;. 

MoveOn&#039;s double standard is astonishing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmmm, Paula Jones didn&#8217;t ask for Clinton to drop trou in the hotel when he was her boss. That&#8217;s sexual harassment, and it&#8217;s certainly actionable. After all, that is why Clinton gave a deposition (under oath), the one in which he perjured himself. </p>
<p>Juanita Broaddrick did not ask to be raped by Clinton. That was totally non-consensual. There&#8217;s no way to spin that.</p>
<p>It is true that the Jones trial was dismissed due to lack of evidence, but the same could be said of Reagan&#8217;s and G.H.W. Bush&#8217;s involvement in Iran/Contra. We&#8217;ll drop Paula Jones when the left shuts up regarding presidential malfeasance in that issue. We&#8217;ll drop Whitewater when the left stops lying about Bush&#8217;s TANG record. We&#8217;ll stop questioning the left&#8217;s true loyalties on the war when they stop calling any criticism of their position  &#8220;McCarthyism&#8221;. </p>
<p>MoveOn&#8217;s double standard is astonishing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cannon</title>
		<link>http://www.mattmargolis.com/archives/2003/12/03/wictory-wednesday/comment-page-1/#comment-2396</link>
		<dc:creator>cannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2003 05:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=230#comment-2396</guid>
		<description>Cole, *all* of Clinton&#039;s sex acts were consentual? Ok tell that to Broderick. Ahhh but it is Clinton so we&#039;ll let a little rape slide.

Concerning Iran-Contra. Perjury has been proven? (as in a guilty plea) Or admitted to? Clinton has admitted he committed perjury.

---

Besides there were &lt;b&gt;2&lt;/b&gt; points. The second was about the money. How can donks claim to be the party of the people when their main source of funding are wealthy *individuals*? Donks claim that the GOP is in the back pocket of business. However businesses represent many different interests called stakeholders. (The stakeholder concept comes not only from management and econ on the right but business ethics on the left.)

So which party is being hijacked by a few extremists? hmmm...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cole, *all* of Clinton&#8217;s sex acts were consentual? Ok tell that to Broderick. Ahhh but it is Clinton so we&#8217;ll let a little rape slide.</p>
<p>Concerning Iran-Contra. Perjury has been proven? (as in a guilty plea) Or admitted to? Clinton has admitted he committed perjury.</p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p>Besides there were <b>2</b> points. The second was about the money. How can donks claim to be the party of the people when their main source of funding are wealthy *individuals*? Donks claim that the GOP is in the back pocket of business. However businesses represent many different interests called stakeholders. (The stakeholder concept comes not only from management and econ on the right but business ethics on the left.)</p>
<p>So which party is being hijacked by a few extremists? hmmm&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Margolis</title>
		<link>http://www.mattmargolis.com/archives/2003/12/03/wictory-wednesday/comment-page-1/#comment-2395</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Margolis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2003 22:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=230#comment-2395</guid>
		<description>People died because Bill Clinton was a lousy Commander-In-Chief who chose not to defend this country against terrorism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People died because Bill Clinton was a lousy Commander-In-Chief who chose not to defend this country against terrorism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cole Whitaker</title>
		<link>http://www.mattmargolis.com/archives/2003/12/03/wictory-wednesday/comment-page-1/#comment-2394</link>
		<dc:creator>Cole Whitaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2003 21:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=230#comment-2394</guid>
		<description>No jackass-- perjury is not a &lt;b&gt;high crime&lt;/b&gt;.  If it was Reagan and Bush would have been impeached from Iran-Contra.  Remember that one... people actually &lt;b&gt;DIED&lt;/b&gt; because of that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No jackass&#8211; perjury is not a <b>high crime</b>.  If it was Reagan and Bush would have been impeached from Iran-Contra.  Remember that one&#8230; people actually <b>DIED</b> because of that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
