bill,raccoon,sheet artillery servers writhed distinguishable:submultiplexed betting online http://www.get-betting.com/

The Boston Herald isn’t Newsday. It’s not. If the Herald prints party affialiations and Newsday dosen’t, that dosen’t say anything about bias. To show something about bias, you have to show that *IN ONE NEWSPAPER* that kind of behavior happens.

I know that kind of scientific concept is difficult for you, but I’ll break through your thick skull eventually.

Also, be careful not to pull stories off the AP wire. You wouldn’t want them to come without attribution because of the AP’s policies.

Look up to the first few entries of the fucking blog you moron!!!! IT’S THERE IN BLACK AND FUCKING WHITE!!

Please provide substantiation or retract.

If you consider that in most articles where a democrat is doing something that is construed to be positive that his party affliation is mentioned, and the when a republican does a good thing, the same is not done, and when he does a bad thing, it IS mentioned, that is clearly bias. Heck, as previously mentioned, Condit was labeled a “conservative democrat.” You never hear anyone refered to as a conservative democrat or a liberal republican unless you are talking about congressional bills and voting results.

I would contest however, the assertion that Romney was not labled a Republican due to author bias as being an assertion wholly without evidence. To use that assertion by comparing two different papers with two different policies is the basest of fraud. Until you can determine what Newsday’s online party-affiliation rules are, I would refrain from attributing motive.

I appreciate your retraction. I think it can be agreed upon that there generally is no set standard as to how a paper uses party affiliation. The practice can vary from publication to publication, local to national stories, and preference/choice of the writer of the story. My initial point was that the latter variable is what makes a difference in whether or not someone like Romney, a Republican, gets labelled a Republican in a story that went on the national wires – to an audience who may not know what he is. Then their is the local story, about a Kennedy, that paints him in a positive light, and the attached his party affiliation, even though the story was local, in a local paper, where there is no question on his affiliation because everyone is well aware.

why invest man hours to do something so small?

Carry on.